early FF13 reviews hmmm seemingly not impressed
#22
Posted 07 February 2010 - 02:41 PM
CoffeeCake, on May 5 2009, 02:01 AM, said:
SEEDDNSA AI THESD FAMILK BOASST MUTTHA FFCUASKs
#23
Posted 12 February 2010 - 01:37 PM
If you refuse to play a game because of low scores or scores that aren't omgwtf 98% on metacritic you're cheating yourself out of a possibly great experience.
I absolutely LOVED Darksiders, but it only got a decent score on Metacritic.
Did that stop me from loving the game? No.
Also arguing over FF8 is ridiculous. It was a love story. Love it or hate it, get over yourselves.
#24
Posted 12 February 2010 - 02:56 PM
Offtopic: I'm looking forward to FF13 if only because I'm getting it as a birthday present and there isn't anything that interesting coming out in March besides Mega Man 10.
Adam, on 12 February 2010 - 04:37 PM, said:
Did that stop me from loving the game? No.
8s and 9s are not "decent" scores.
#25
Posted 12 February 2010 - 03:20 PM
J-Stop, on 12 February 2010 - 04:56 PM, said:
Offtopic: I'm looking forward to FF13 if only because I'm getting it as a birthday present and there isn't anything that interesting coming out in March besides Mega Man 10.
8s and 9s are not "decent" scores.
those would be considered "good" scores.
And Adam, you say you don't care if a game gets bad reviews, but you look at reviews apparently using metacritic as an example. fail.
#26
Posted 12 February 2010 - 08:32 PM
Artie, on 12 February 2010 - 05:20 PM, said:
And Adam, you say you don't care if a game gets bad reviews, but you look at reviews apparently using metacritic as an example. fail.
What would you prefer I use? Game Informer?
Most people will cite Metacritic as a source for their game reviews and base their interest off of that. I could care less what a game makes.
#27
Posted 12 February 2010 - 10:13 PM
Adam, on 12 February 2010 - 11:32 PM, said:
Some people do, most people don't. No one gives a shit about people who do anyway because sites like Metacritic and Gamerankings pick out certain sties reviews and skew point scales for any site who doesn't use a 1-10 point scale.
Who cares? No one's even talking about metacritic or gamerankings scores here besides Wind.
(and 8.5/85%/4 out of 5 stars/3 hotdogs out of 2 cupcakes is no where near a "bad" score to begin with.)
#29
Posted 13 February 2010 - 12:16 AM
Adam, on 12 February 2010 - 10:32 PM, said:
Most people will cite Metacritic as a source for their game reviews and base their interest off of that. I could care less what a game makes.
well for starters to bolster your point you could've used a site that didnt have a good review for Darksiders, not an 83.
And I prefer using the donut/bagels system. I would give Darksiders 4 donuts and a half a bagel out of 5 donuts.
#30
Posted 13 February 2010 - 10:07 AM
and hip guy, I don't get a hardon over every Suikoden game. 4 sucked ass, so bye bye whatever you were trying to convey.
Sometimes, the remedy is death."
#32
Posted 05 March 2010 - 01:59 PM
Between this and Heavy Rain Sony fanboys have overturned Nintendo fanboys for annoyance levels. A lot of message boards are now a pain in the ass to read anymore because no one wants to have a discussion about games, they just want to bitch and flame/defend.
/rant.
#33
Posted 05 March 2010 - 02:06 PM
Sometimes, the remedy is death."
#34
#36
Posted 06 March 2010 - 08:56 AM
The creator said it isn't a RPG.
no rpg = scar not giving a shit.
Sometimes, the remedy is death."

Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote





