Crube Posted August 28, 2006 Share Posted August 28, 2006 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5284850.stm Cancer cell 'executioner' found Scientists have developed a way of "executing" cancer cells. Healthy cells have a built-in process which means they commit suicide if something is wrong, a process which fails in cancer cells. The University of Illinois team created a synthetic molecule which caused cancer cells to self-destruct. Cancer experts said the study, in Nature Chemical Biology, offered "exciting possibilities" for new ways of treating the disease. These findings present an exciting new therapeutic strategy for the treatment of some cancers Dr Michael Olsen, Cancer Research UK One of the hallmarks of cancer cells is their resistance to the body's cell suicide signals, which allow them to survive and develop into tumours. All cells contain a protein called procaspase-3, which the body should be able to turn into caspase-3 - an executioner enzyme. But this transformation does not happen in cancer cells, even though certain types, such as colon cancer, leukaemia, skin and liver cancers paradoxically have very high levels of procaspase-3. Healthy cells unaffected The researchers examined more than 20,000 structurally different synthetic compounds to see if any could trigger procaspase-3 to develop into caspase-3. They found the molecule PAC-1 did trigger the transformation, and cancer cells from mice and from human tumours could be prompted to self-destruct - a process called apoptosis. The more procaspase-3 a cancer cell had, the less of the molecule was needed. Healthy cells, such as white blood cells, were found to be significantly less affected by the addition of PAC-1 because they had much lower levels of procaspase-3, so cell-suicide could not be triggered. When the scientists tested PAC-1 on cancerous and non-cancerous tissue from the same person, the tumour cells were 2,000-fold more sensitive to PAC-1. Since different levels of procaspase-3 were found in the cell lines studied, the researchers suggest some patients would be more responsive to this therapy than others, so the it might one day be possible to tailor treatments to individual patients. 'Exciting' Professor Paul Hergenrother, who led the research, said: "This is the first in what could be a host of organic compounds with the ability to directly activate executioner enzymes. "The potential effectiveness of compounds such as PAC-1 could be predicted in advance, and patients could be selected for treatment based on the amount of procaspase-3 found in their tumour cells." Cancer Research UK expert Dr Michael Olson, who is based at the Beatson Institute for Cancer Research in Glasgow, said: "These findings present an exciting new therapeutic strategy for the treatment of some cancers. "It remains to be seen which, if any tumour types consistently express elevated procaspase-3. That will tell us how many patients could potentially benefit from the drug. "Clinical trials will be needed to confirm whether procaspase-3 causes any adverse effects in humans." Link to comment
Nega-Brent Posted August 28, 2006 Share Posted August 28, 2006 Meh... when are they going to find a way to ressurect the original cast of Bonanza? That's the real leap in science that everyone is waiting for. Link to comment
Anime Gee Posted August 28, 2006 Share Posted August 28, 2006 Oh man! This is a great cure if it actually works out! One of my friends only has a few more days to live. ( ;o;) Link to comment
Ceraziefish Posted August 28, 2006 Share Posted August 28, 2006 That sucks, Gee. Still, if it works that's way awesome. Go go science. Link to comment
Venom112 Posted August 28, 2006 Share Posted August 28, 2006 Ah shucks. Now this future cure is either bound to go missing or be claimed to be too hazardous. Link to comment
HappyLittleBoozer Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 So, we finally have a real cure for cancer. Great. Too bad for the next 20 years, only 2% of the people in the world will be wealthy enough to actually receive the treatment. Link to comment
Crube Posted August 29, 2006 Author Share Posted August 29, 2006 Didn't they say the same for the polio vaccine? Link to comment
Gundampilotspaz Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 Didn't they say the same for the polio vaccine? No Link to comment
The Lone Magician Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 Wish they've had this back in 1998... Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now