Jump to content
Accelerated Evolution

Want to make fun of religion? It will only cost you your son.


Recommended Posts

How sure are we that this is the reason her son was taken away, though? Perhaps she developed a drug or alcohol problem that the article failed to mention. A judge stating that participation in a satire religion means you are obviously unfit to be a parent is highly illogical. It seems like there's something missing.

a judge directly asking questions about a satire to determine custody is also highly illogical. I am perfectly capable of believing that the judge is the most fucked up one in this situation. I'm not saying she doesn't have problems, I'm just saying the judge isn't acting correctly, and if the dad is out of state, he probably isn't a model parent either.

Link to comment

This article made me feel sorry for the judge! ^^;; Although I don't agree with him, I think the article could be a bit more unbiased....

The Beast can be unbiased? What world are you from?

It is biased, but I'm pretty sure that there is reason to be concerned about the judge

Link to comment

Wait, wait, so was her son taken away because the judge thought she was taking part in some kind of nutty new religion, because she was making fun of other religions? Or was it because of her conduct while doing either?

The third one isn't maybe so bad, especially if there is some aspect or key fact we're missing about this. If it's the second and thus no making fun of religion well.... fuck that. Now if it's the first reason, with no basis for concern about the third, then this is really fucking fuck fuck fucked! That means he's saying that not following one of his court approved religions = unfit to be a parent!

Taking a child away from his or her mother (or father if he already has custody for some reason or both) without a really, really, extremely good reason (life or death etc) is fucking outrageous!

Link to comment

Wait, wait, so was her son taken away because the judge thought she was taking part in some kind of nutty new religion, because she was making fun of other religions? Or was it because of her conduct while doing either?

The third one isn't maybe so bad, especially if there is some aspect or key fact we're missing about this. If it's the second and thus no making fun of religion well.... fuck that. Now if it's the first reason, with no basis for concern about the third, then this is really fucking fuck fuck fucked! That means he's saying that not following one of his court approved religions = unfit to be a parent!

Taking a child away from his or her mother (or father if he already has custody for some reason or both) without a really, really, extremely good reason (life or death etc) is fucking outrageous!

I think that one of the pictures involved nudity, which might have had something to do with the judge spending 15 minutes looking at them alone. I doubt the mother was a model parent, but the judge and father don't come across as spectacular role models either.

Orly? I have never heard of The Beast before so, I would not know.... :cool:

sorry, I guess I shouldn't have assumed that you would have, but on the otherhand it doesn't take too long on their website to figure out that they are biased

Link to comment

I dream of a world where I am worshipped as the one and only God, and people follow my every whim. I dream of a world where the Bills win the Superbowl, the Sabres win the Stanley Cup, and UB footaball wins two games straight. I dream of a world where GPS and Belial agree on something. Doesn't mean any of it will ever happen.

Link to comment

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...