Belial Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 Apparently freespeach is a arrestable offense now-a-days. Sheehan arrested in House gallery Tuesday, January 31, 2006; Posted: 10:26 p.m. EST (03:26 GMT) WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Peace activist Cindy Sheehan was arrested Tuesday in the House gallery after refusing to cover up a T-shirt bearing an anti-war slogan before President Bush's State of the Union address. "She was asked to cover it up. She did not," said Sgt. Kimberly Schneider, U.S. Capitol Police spokeswoman, adding that Sheehan was arrested for unlawful conduct, a misdemeanor. The charge carries a maximum penalty of one year in jail, Schneider said. Schneider said shortly after the State of the Union speech that Sheehan was still being held but should be "out sometime tonight." An early report from a senior House official indicated that Sheehan was arrested for unfurling an anti-war banner, but that was later found not to be the case. Schneider said she didn't know what Sheehan's T-shirt said. Sheehan, who became a vocal war opponent after her son was killed in Iraq, was an invited guest of Rep. Lynn Woolsey, D-California, who has called for a withdrawal of troops in Iraq and supports legislation for the creation of a Department of Peace. Sheehan has pestered the Bush administration since August, when she and hundreds of fellow protesters began demanding an audience with the president and camping outside his ranch in Crawford, Texas. She also recently penned a book, "Not One More Mother's Child." Sheehan and other relatives of troops killed in Iraq met with Bush during a visit to Fort Lewis, Washington, in April 2004, shortly after Sheehan's son was killed. During that meeting with Bush, the president refused to look at pictures of Sheehan's son, didn't want to hear about him and "didn't even know Casey's name," she said. The Vacaville, California, resident has said she'd like to meet with Bush again to discuss her opposition to the war. Bush has refused to meet again with Sheehan and has taken issue with her calls for a withdrawal of troops from Iraq. "She expressed her opinion; I disagree with it," Bush said in August. "I think immediate withdrawal from Iraq would be a mistake." Link to comment
TeleportSandwich Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 *waits for republican gloating fest* I don't praticularly like this women though. Kinda annoying Link to comment
Ceraziefish Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 Whether you like her or not, she was ARRESTED for something on a T-SHIRT. Not even because it was offensive -- it was 'Unlawful.' How can it be 'Unlawful' to speak out against the war? This is fucked, fucked I say! I don't care where you are or what you're doing -- there is no reason to outlaw free speech like this. Imagine -- if someone had worn a pro-war t-shirt they wouldn't've got a second glance. Link to comment
Wind Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 Can't wait for GPS to wake up. Link to comment
margot Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 "Sheehan has pestered the Bush administration since August" Oh bias. Expect people like Bill O'Reily to congratulate her arrest. Link to comment
darkon Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 My question is what makes her different from the other Americans against the war? Why are we singling her out? Link to comment
Kreutz Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 They're not even trying to cover it up anymore, are they? Link to comment
Gundampilotspaz Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 Well Bush would be upset and distracted if he saw someone who didn't like him. His speeches have been rehearsed for so long. Link to comment
Svenska Aeroplan Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 This woman pisses me off. Her son knew what the risks were when he signed up. He joined of his own free will. Getting arrested because of what is on your T-shirt is bullshit though. Link to comment
TeleportSandwich Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 My question is what makes her different from the other Americans against the war? Why are we singling her out? She's a public figure. This just makes it easier for conservatives to put a face on the "liberal threat" that the country (IE thier party) is supposedly facing. S'not like they didn't have enouph scapegoates already, though This woman pisses me off. Her son knew what the risks were when he signed up. He joined of his own free will. Getting arrested because of what is on your T-shirt is bullshit though. I agree with the above statement Link to comment
Hero Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 This woman pisses me off. Her son knew what the risks were when he signed up. He joined of his own free will. You're still allowed to protest a stupid war, regardless of whether or not someone knew the risks. Her complaints are not suddenly invalid because her son signed up. If you lost a loved one on the basis that the President lied about the war, you'd be hunky-dorey with it, right? Link to comment
Svenska Aeroplan Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 You're still allowed to protest a stupid war, regardless of whether or not someone knew the risks. Her complaints are not suddenly invalid because her son signed up. If you lost a loved one on the basis that the President lied about the war, you'd be hunky-dorey with it, right? Yes. She is still allowed to protest the war. That doesn't mean she can't also piss me off while doing it. Link to comment
Poophy Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 That’s what they were expecting her to do. So they arrested her before she could commit the “crime” they thought she was going to commit… what sci-fi movie have I seen that in? Link to comment
guy incognito Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 House rules prohibit demonstrations within the galleries. The correct actions where taken place. I see nothing wrong. Link to comment
Mithrandir Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 If I recall correctly, one of the republican senators' wives was wearing a t-shirt in favor of the war and she didn't get arrested. Or does it only count as a demonstration if they're expressing views that are different from that of the current political majority? Link to comment
amy Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Actually I think the same action was taken for both women, but the republican woman was like "k sry" and Sheehan was like "omg first amendment" and got arrested for not complying, I don't think they would have spoken to her if it weren't for the House rule against demonstrations in the gallery if only to avoid bad publicity NOT THAT BUSH DOESN'T SUCK :D Link to comment
darkon Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Well Bush would be upset and distracted if he saw someone who didn't like him. His speeches have been rehearsed for so long. Which is why when mentioning how his Social Security reform didn't happen the Democrats stood up and applauded. After that he had to freestyle a little bit and improvise for a little bit. By the way, that is also the greatest moment in State of the Union history. Link to comment
Mithrandir Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Yeah, my Government teacher talked about that for like 10 minutes today. Link to comment
darkon Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Yeah, my Government teacher talked about that for like 10 minutes today. Mine did too. We live in like equal planes of existence on opposite sides of the continent. Link to comment
Mithrandir Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Yeah, I know. It's almost creepy. Link to comment
Poophy Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Well for what its worth, they did release her… Link to comment
Samurai Drifter Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 Even though I agree that immediate withdrawl from Iraq would be a mistake, that isn't the issue. She was arrested for refusing to supress her opinion and it's just one of the many ways the Bush administration is taking away freedoms and civil liberties. House rules prohibit demonstrations within the galleries. The correct actions where taken place. I see nothing wrong. T-shirt != demonstration. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now