Baltar Posted February 8, 2006 Share Posted February 8, 2006 The Rolling stones super bowl show was censored in an article on mtv.com. I know this may have a bias view since MTV could be bitter about never being able to do a halftime show again, however the source is the associated press. the point is some of the lyrics from "Rough Justice" and "Start me up" were edited out due to the fact they were to sexually suggestive to be played on TV. My problem is that there were way worse things on TV during the fucking super bowl, commercials and such, (we all saw Jessica Simpsons horrible proformance ) so why just target the stones? Although The Stones shouldn't have been targeted at all, nor anything during that time for censorship. What is this the 50's again? Is Rock music the devil? "(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction" was able to avoid being edited at all, which to me is slightly funny. Any Comments? Link to comment
GummyBearOfDoom Posted February 8, 2006 Share Posted February 8, 2006 Idk, me and GPS watched Dios Sacred heart concert. Link to comment
Arcane Posted February 8, 2006 Share Posted February 8, 2006 I just loved how there were no women within 50 feet of the performance. Link to comment
Baltar Posted February 8, 2006 Author Share Posted February 8, 2006 Yea it was a cock fest. Link to comment
Belial Posted February 8, 2006 Share Posted February 8, 2006 I just loved how there were no women within 50 feet of the performance. They didn't want to risk being impregnated, since Mick Jagger and Keith Richards are both that potent that just being near them could do the trick. Link to comment
Battle_Pope Posted February 8, 2006 Share Posted February 8, 2006 mick jagger definitely looked his age. Link to comment
uniform_motion Posted February 8, 2006 Share Posted February 8, 2006 Censorship of shit that we've all seen and heard of before... Link to comment
darkon Posted February 8, 2006 Share Posted February 8, 2006 My biggest problem with the performance was that the acoustics were TERRIBLE. They sounded horrible on TV. They played Baltimore a week ago and a bunch of people I know saw them and said they played like they were 20. Link to comment
Ceraziefish Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 I thought the crime was that the Superbowl was four hours long and the Stones played for 12 minutes. It should've been the other way around. Link to comment
Wind Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Atleast 30 minute set would have been good. I thought they kicked some ass but yeah, the sound quality was poor. Last year, Paul McCartney's performance was masterful, the light show / effects and sound included. Link to comment
darkon Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 I wanted Rush. Maybe they'll perform at a Grey Cup someday. Link to comment
Siendra Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 O.o Somebody outside of Canada knows what the Grey Cup is? This suprises me to no end. Link to comment
Crube Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 O.o Somebody outside of Canada knows what the Grey Cup is? This suprises me to no end. You never bothered asking me if I knew what it was! And yes, I am aware of it! Link to comment
darkon Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 O.o Somebody outside of Canada knows what the Grey Cup is? This suprises me to no end. My city WON a Grey Cup. The only American team to do so! Link to comment
Siendra Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 My city WON a Grey Cup. The only American team to do so! Huh....? *Doesn't follow football* Link to comment
darkon Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 Huh....? *Doesn't follow football* Baltimore Stallions won in I think 1995... and then the team promptly moved to Montreal to make room for the Ravens. Our entire goal of getting a CFL team was as an audition for NFL owners to move their team to our city. Link to comment
Siendra Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 Wait a sec... So a US city had a CFL team? What the heck? Link to comment
darkon Posted February 18, 2006 Share Posted February 18, 2006 Wait a sec... So a US city had a CFL team? What the heck? A couple of US cities did. The CFL tried to expand down here in the mid-90s... they should've tried it 5 years before they did since at that time the NFL had some serious labor strife and strikes and what not. Link to comment
Ceraziefish Posted February 18, 2006 Share Posted February 18, 2006 Aren't there a few American teams in Canadian cities? Well, not American teams, but you know what I mean. Link to comment
Belial Posted February 18, 2006 Share Posted February 18, 2006 Aren't there a few American teams in Canadian cities? Well, not American teams, but you know what I mean. Not that I know of. There's MLB, and NBA teams and lots of NHL teams, but unless they've gotten a football team in the last couple years that I was unaware of, then the answer is no. Link to comment
darkon Posted February 19, 2006 Share Posted February 19, 2006 There is no NFL team in Canada. There are 6 hockey teams, 1 baseball, and 1 basketball teams. Link to comment
Belial Posted February 21, 2006 Share Posted February 21, 2006 There is no NFL team in Canada. There are 6 hockey teams, 1 baseball, and 1 basketball teams. Did Canada use to have another MLB team, cuz I swear there was another one up there. (Nevermind, I did some reaserch and the team I was thinking of was the Montreal Expos, who now play in D.C.) Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now